Advances in Conceptual Ship Design Accounting for the Risk of Environmental Pollution

Keywords: energy efficiency, design index, environmental pollution, life cycle assessment, risk-based design

Abstract

The present paper provides a thorough analysis of the prerequisites in adopting a new paradigm in the conceptual ship design accounting for the environmental pollution driven by maritime transportations. A survey of presently issued IMO environmental requirements outlines the framework within ship design solutions. Identified and carefully examined are several competing optimal design solutions, based on the energy efficiency design index introduced for shipbuilding, operation cost, and the resale costs at the end of the service life, which are used as input variables in a risk-based analysis. Reviewed are the immediate steps taken in the risk-based conceptual ship design to minimise the risk of environmental pollution while considering the life cycle assessment and energy efficiency of the ship propulsion system. Brought forth in the current paper are the results of a study into the concept design of series of containerships operating in the Black Sea for transporting 20, 40 and 45-foot containers aimed at identifying the main dimensions, capacity, visibility, freeboard, stability, bow, and stern design, propulsion complex and propeller design, control and manoeuvrability, seakeeping, energy efficiency design index, capital, and operational expenditures, that leads to the required fright rate for the ships in the range of 4,000 to 14,000 DWT. Accordingly, a bulk carrier’s risk-based concept ship design methodology is employed for the ship life cycle assessment and energy efficiency in pursuance of the optimal design solution in reference to the energy efficiency design index as most applicable to shipbuilding, operation, and resale costs at the end of the service life, and used as input variables in the risk estimate.

References

Barr, R., Miller, E., Ankudinov, V., & Lee, F. (1981). Technical Basis for Manoeuvring Performance Standards. Défense Technical Information Centre.
Google Scholar
 
Bergström, M., Erikstad, S., & Ehlers, S. (2016). Assessment of the applicability of goal- and risk-based design on Arctic sea transport systems. Ocean Engineering, 128, pp. 183-198.
Crossref
 
Blasco, J., Durán-Grado, V., Hampel, M., & Moreno-Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of emissions from ships' propulsion systems. Environment International, 66, 44-47.
Crossref
 
Boulougouris, E., Papanikolaou, A., & Pavlou, A. (2011). Energy efficiency parametric design tool in the framework of holistic ship design optimisation. 225. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment.
Crossref
 
Damyanliev , T., Georgiev, P., Denev , Y., Naydenov , L., Garbatov, Y., & Atanasova, I. (2021). Short sea shipping and shipbuilding capacity of the East Mediterranean and Black Sea regions. In C. Guedes Soares, & T. A. Santos, Developments in Maritime Technology and Engineering. London: Taylor&Francis.
 
de Jong, J. (2020). Better Ships, Blue Oceans. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE. Influence of EEDI on Ship Design & Operation. London: RINA.
 
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agrawal, S., & Meyarivan , T. (2002). A Fast and Elitist Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 182-197.
Crossref
 
DNV. (2009). MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI - Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships: Technical and Operational Implications. Hovik: DNV.
 
DNV-GL. (2019, March 12). Sulphur limit in ECAs - increased risk of PSC deficiencies and detentions. Retrieved 12 15, 2020, from https://www.dnvgl.com/news/sulphur-limit-in-ecas-increased-risk-of-psc-deficiencies-and-detentions-142911
 
Fenhann, J. (2017). CO2 Emissions from International Shipping. UNEP DTU Partnership Working Paper Series, 4.
Google Scholar
 
Garbatov, Y., & Georgiev, P. (2021). Risk-based conceptual ship design of a bulk carrier accounting for energy efficiency design index (EEDI). International Journal of Maritime Engineering, Part A, (In print).
 
Garbatov, Y., Sisci, F., & Ventura, M. (2018a). Risk-based framework for ship and structural design accounting for maintenance planning. Ocean Engineering, 166, 12-25.
Crossref
 
Garbatov, Y., Ventura, M., Guedes Soares, C., Georgiev, P., Kosh, T., & Atanasova, I. (2018b). Framework for conceptual ship design accounting for risk-based life cycle assessment. In C. Guedes Soares, & A. Teixeira (Eds.), Maritime transportation and harvesting of sea resources (pp. 921-931). London: Taylor&Francis.
Google Scholar
 
Horn, J., Nafliotis, N., & Goldberg, D. (1994). A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimisation. In First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation (Ed.). 1, pp. 82-87. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Centre.
Crossref
 
IMO. (2002). Consolidated text of the guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circ.1023/MEPC/Circ.392. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing.
 
IMO. (2005). Amendments to the guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circ.1180-MEPC/Circ.474. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing.
 
IMO. (2008a). Formal safety assessment on crude oil tankers. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing.
 
IMO. (2008b). Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships: Updated 2000 Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships. London: IMO.
 
IMO. (2013). Revised guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rulemaking process.MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing.
 
IMO. (2016). IMO train the Trainer (TTT) Course on Energy Efficient Ship Operation: Module 2 - Ship Energy Efficiency Regulations and Related Guidelines. London: IMO.
 
Kågeson, P. (1999). Economic instruments for reducing emissions from sea transport. Solna, Sweden: Williamson Offset.
Google Scholar
 
Komuro, R., Ford, E., & Reynolds, J. (2006). The use of multi-criteria assessment in developing a process model. Ecological Modelling, 197, 320-330.
Crossref
 
Lindstad, E., & Bø, T. (2018). Potential power setups, fuels and hull designs capable of satisfying future EEDI requirements. Transportation Research Part D, 63, 276-290.
Crossref
 
MEPC.304(72). (2018). Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. Lon-don: MEPC.
Google Scholar
 
Naydenov, L., & Georgiev, P. (2020). Prospects for sea transport of intermodal containers in the Black Sea. Fifteenth International Conference on Marine Sciences and Technologies - the Black Sea 2020 (pp. 97-105). Varna: Varna Scientific and Technical Unions.
 
Nowacki, H. (2019). On the History of Ship Design for the Life Cycle. In A. Papanikolaou (Ed.), A Holistic Approach to Ship Design. (pp. 43-74). Athens: Springer.
Crossref
 
Papadimitriou, S., Koliousis, I., Sdoukopoulos, E., Lyridis, D., Tsioumas, V., & Stavroulakis, P. (2018). The Dynamics of Short Sea Shipping. New Practices and Trends. Cham, Switzer-land: Palgrave Macmillan. 
Crossref
 
Papanikolaou, A., Guedes Soares, C., Jasinowski, A., Jensen, J., McGeorge, D., Poylio, E., Vassalos, D. (2009). Risk-Based Ship Design. Heidelberg: Springer.
Crossref
 
Plessas, T., Kanellopoulou, A., Zaraphonitis, G., Papanikolaou, A., & Shigunov, V. (2018). Exploration of design space and optimisation of RoPax vessels and containerships in view of EEDI and safe operation in adverse sea conditions. Ocean Engineering, 162, 1-20.
Crossref
 
Rodrigue, J.P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems (5 ed. ed.). New York: Routledge.
Crossref
 
Smith, T., Raucci, C., Haji Hosseinloo, S., Rojon, I., Calleya, J., Suárez de la Fuente, S., Palmer, K. (2016). CO2 emissions from international shipping. Possible reduction targets and their associated pathways. London: UMAS.
 
Tan, X., Taob, J., & Konovessis, D. (2019). Preliminary design of a tanker ship in the context of collision-induced environmental-risk-based ship design. Ocean Engineering, 181, 185-197.
Crossref
 
UNCTAD. (2020). Review of Maritime Transport 2019. Geneva: UNCTAD.
 
Woud, K., & Stapersma, D. (2002). Design of propulsion and electric power generation systems. London: IMarEST.
Google Scholar
 
Yotsov, I., Dimitrakiev, D., Zaburtov, A., & Koritarov, T. (2017). Analysis of the Logistics Transport Corridors in Black Sea ReGion Based on the Short Sea Shipping Concept. Varna: International Association of Maritime Universities.


Total number of hits on abstract = 61 times

Downloads for 2021

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2021-06-13
How to Cite
Garbatov, Y., & Georgiev, P. (2021, June 13). Advances in Conceptual Ship Design Accounting for the Risk of Environmental Pollution. ANNUAL JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF VARNA, BULGARIA, 5(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.29114/ajtuv.vol5.iss1.227
Section
TRANSPORT, NAVIGATION AND AVIATION
Bookmark and Share