Quantum secure communication models comparison

  • Georgi Petrov Bebrov Technical University of Varna
  • Rozalina Stefanova Dimova Technical University of Varna
Keywords: quantum cryptography, quantum secure communication, quantum teleportation, superdense coding

Abstract

The paper concerns the quantum cryptography, more specifically, the quantum secure communication type of schemes. The main focus here is on making a comparison between the distinct secure quantum communication models – quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication, in terms of three parameters: resource efficiency, eavesdropping check efficiency, and security (degree of preserving the confidentiality).

References

Bebrov, G., Dimova, R., & Pencheva, E. (2017). Quantum approach to the information privacy in Smart Grid. Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) & 2017 Intl Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics (ACEMP), Brasov, Romania, 971–976.
Crossref
 
Cabello, A. (2000). Quantum key distribution in the Holevo limit, Physical Review Letters, 85(26 Pt 1), 5635-8.
Crossref
 
Cheng, C., Lu, R., Petzoldt, A., & Takagi, T. (2017). Securing the Internet of Things in a quantum world. IEEE Communication magazine, 25(2), 116–120.
Crossref
 
Diamanti, E., Lo, H., Qi, B., & Yuan, Z. (2016). Practical challenges in quantum key distribution, NPJ Quantum Information 2, 16025. 
Crossref
  
Hassanpour, S. & Houshmand, M. (2015). Efficient controlled quantum secure direct communication based on GHZ-like states. Quantum Information Processing, 14(2), 739–753. 
Crossref
 
Joy, D., Surendran, S., & Sabir, M. (2017). Efficient Deterministic Secure Quantum Communication protocols using multipartite entangled states. Quantum Information Processing, 16(6), 1–11. 
Crossref
 
Liu, Z., Chen, H., Liu, W., Xu, J., Wang, d., & Li, Z. (2013). Quantum secure direct communica-tion with optimal quantum superdense coding by using general four-qubit states. Quan-tum Information Processing, Volume 12, Issue 1, 587-599. 
Crossref
 
Long, G., Deng, F., Wang, C., Li, X., Wen, K., & Wang, W. (2007). Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication. Frontiers of Physics in China, Volume 2, Issue 3, 251–272.
Crossref
 
Nieles, M., Dempsey, K., & Pilliteri, V. (2017). An introduction to Information Security. NIST Special Publication 800-12, U.S. Department of Commerce. 
Crossref
 
Stallings, W. (2017). Cryptography and Network Security. Principles and Practice. Global Edition, Pearson Press.
 
Wang, C., Deng, F., Li, Y., Liu, X., & Long, G. (2005). Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication. Physical Review A, Volume 71, Issue 4, 044305.
Crossref
 
Yan, F., Zhang, X. (2004). A scheme for secure direct communication using EPR pairs and teleportation. The European Physical Journal B 41, 75–78.
Crossref
 
Zhang, W., Ding, D., Sheng, Y., Lan, Z., Shi, B. & Guo, G. (2017). Quantum secure direct communication with quantum memory. Physical Review Letters, Volume 118, Issue 22, 220501.
Crossref


Total number of hits on abstract = 251 times

Downloads for 2019

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-12-28
How to Cite
Bebrov, G., & Dimova, R. (2017, December 28). Quantum secure communication models comparison. ANNUAL JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF VARNA, BULGARIA, 1(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.29114/ajtuv.vol1.iss1.27
Section
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
Bookmark and Share